Targeting prostatic tumor micro-environment to address therapy resistance
Editorial

Targeting prostatic tumor micro-environment to address therapy resistance

Charles J. Rosser

Cancer Research Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL 32827, USA

Correspondence to: Charles J. Rosser, MD, MBA, FACS. Cancer Research Institute, 6900 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL 32827, USA. Email: Charles.rosser@orlandohealth.com.

Submitted Mar 25, 2013. Accepted for publication Apr 22, 2013.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.07


Cure or control of disseminated disease remains the greatest challenge facing cancer clinicians and scientists, and is the greatest cause of patient mortality. Predominantly, the cancer related deaths stem from the growth and development of disease that is resistant to the killing effects of available oncolytic therapies. Much attention has been given to the overexpression of cellular drug transporters (e.g., MDR1) and changes associated in drug kinetics (1-6), however, over the past decade numerous reports have linked tumor heterogeneity as the root cause in the development of therapy resistant. The major contributors to intratumoural heterogeneity include: genetic variation leading to cell plasticity (i.e., the ability of a cell to reversibly and flexibly change lineage) and the microenvironment. Example of genetic variation leading to cell plasticity is seen when prostate cancer cells and human prostate tumors are exposed to sublethal doses of radiation, which will turn on key anti-apoptotic pathways leading to continued tumor growth and resistance to therapy (7). Here specific pathways may be targeted resulting in a therapeutic advantage. However these savvy cancer cells ultimately can circumvent the targeted molecule and pathway and eventually exploit another survival pathway, thus once again duping researchers and clinicians, resulting in tumor growth. Thus new approaches must be utilized to get a clear advantage over cancers and then to leverage these new approaches into carefully studying tumor biology in hopes of identifying novel targets, which in turn could radically modify current treatment paradigms. One such new approach is to identify key survival factors within the tumor microenvironment. In the article entitled ‘Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B’, authors Sun et al. address this critical predicament of therapy resistance in the clinical management of prostate cancer patients by assessing fibroblasts related to tumors. Specifically, WNT16B was found to be increased within fibroblasts exposed to cytotoxic agents both in vitro, in vivo and within human tumors (prostate, breast and ovarian). In human tumors, WNT16B expression was associated with higher rates of disease recurrence after conventional chemotherapy. Subsequently, engineered fibroblasts demonstrating high vs. low levels of WNT16B were analyzed in a panel of sophisticated experiments. Bottom line these experiments demonstrate a survival advantage when epithelial cell cultures or xenograft tumors were exposed to cytotoxic agents and WNT16B was present compared to exposure with cytotoxic agents and WNT16B was low or absent. Lastly, the authors illustrated that WNT16B expression is regulated by NF-κB. After DNA damage, WNT16B signals in a paracrine manner tumors cells, which then can increase their proliferation or resist apoptosis. This is not the first paper to remark how the tumor microenvironment can exert a growth advantage. Previous researchers have demonstrated that certain growth factors and immune suppressor cells within the tumor microenvironment can result in continue tumor growth despite therapy (8-10). However, the current manuscript does add substantial to the body of literature describing this phenomenon. In fact, perhaps more attention should be given to the microenvironment which acts as a scaffold and supports the growth of tumors. If key survival proteins and pathways can be identified then perhaps targeting these proteins and pathways will lead to unsuitable milieu to support the growth of the cancerous epithelial cells or perhaps such an unsuitable milieu would render epithelia cells more susceptible to the killing of effects of conventional oncolytic therapies at lower doses and thus portraying a better therapeutic index.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Cancer Research. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.07). The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Scotto KW. Transcriptional regulation of ABC drug transporters. Oncogene 2003;22:7496-511. [PubMed]
  2. Campa D, Sainz J, Pardini B, et al. A comprehensive investigation on common polymorphisms in the MDR1/ABCB1 transporter gene and susceptibility to colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2012;7:e32784 [PubMed]
  3. Huo H, Magro PG, Pietsch EC, et al. Histone methyltransferase MLL1 regulates MDR1 transcription and chemoresistance. Cancer Res 2010;70:8726-35. [PubMed]
  4. Cardinale D, Guaitoli G, Tondi D, et al. Protein-protein interface-binding peptides inhibit the cancer therapy target human thymidylate synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:E542-9. [PubMed]
  5. Haq R, Shoag J, Andreu-Perez P, et al. Oncogenic BRAF Regulates Oxidative Metabolism via PGC1α and MITF. Cancer Cell 2013;23:302-15. [PubMed]
  6. Wilting RH, Dannenberg JH. Epigenetic mechanisms in tumorigenesis, tumor cell heterogeneity and drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat 2012;15:21-38. [PubMed]
  7. Anai S, Tanaka M, Shiverick KT, et al. Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 correlates with resistance to radiation in human prostate adenocarcinoma cells. J Urol 2007;177:1913-7. [PubMed]
  8. Straussman R, Morikawa T, Shee K, et al. Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion. Nature 2012;487:500-4. [PubMed]
  9. Wang SE, Yu Y, Criswell TL, et al. Oncogenic mutations regulate tumor microenvironment through induction of growth factors and angiogenic mediators. Oncogene 2010;29:3335-48. [PubMed]
  10. Porvasnik S, Sakamoto N, Kusmartsev S, et al. Effects of CXCR4 antagonist CTCE-9908 on prostate tumor growth. Prostate 2009;69:1460-9. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Rosser CJ. Targeting prostatic tumor micro-environment to address therapy resistance. Transl Cancer Res 2013;2(2):62-63. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.07

Download Citation