Single nucleotide polymorphisms as the new predictors of therapy decisions in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma?
Editorial Commentary

Single nucleotide polymorphisms as the new predictors of therapy decisions in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma?

Christoph Schulz1, Sebastian Stintzing2

1Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany 2Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. Sebastian Stintzing. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Email: sebastian.stintzing@charite.de.

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Cancer Research. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Comment on: Perkhofer L, Hann A. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as the new predictors of therapy decisions in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma? Transl Cancer Res 2019;8:1656-8.


Submitted Oct 21, 2019. Accepted for publication Jan 02, 2020.

doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.06


We are delighted having caused an editorial with regard to our paper on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and neoadjuvant treatment toxicity of FLOT within locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (1,2).

Perkhofer and Hann point out the lack of outcome prediction for the now widely used FLOT regiment in gastric cancer. With an aging population, the need for biomarkers predicting toxicity, especially life-threatening toxicity such as neutropenia, is markedly increasing and it is important to individualize treatment options and dosage. In the elderly, intensive treatment options such as the FLOT regimen may not be used just because of the age of the patients. SNPs could therefore represent an easy approach to predict toxicity. As pointed out, a prospective validation would be desirable to include such biomarkers for toxicity in everyday clinical practice.

Therapeutic decisions for perioperative chemotherapy are often solely based on tumor histology and stage. Even tumor board decisions just include the results of organ function diagnostic and a subjective assessment of patients’ fitness to recommend an intensive or a less intensive therapy. The assessment of Her2 in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma displays the only proposed personalized therapy individualization according to the current German and European guidelines (3,4).

Pretherapeutic clino-pathological parameters may help to predict response and prognosis of preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer and represent a first step towards patient tailored therapy (5). The achievement of a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment is of prognostic value in terms of response but can only be obtained after treatment is completed (6).

The use of germline SNPs from peritumoral formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded stroma tissue has the advantage of sufficient availability of tissue after resection in contrast to small samples from gastroscopy during the diagnostic workup where the spare material is often used up for routine histological staining. A workable compromise displays the use of genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood which can be obtained before the initiation of therapy. For future trials, the use of complementary use of liquid biopsy and tissue bound analysis represents a further step towards therapy individualization.

Despite some data concerning treatment outcome and toxicity of gastric cancer by the analysis of germline polymorphisms, validated evidence concerning SNPs in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting is still limited. The transfer of data derived from palliative setting is suggestive but auxiliary. Same applies to pharmacogenetic data of several other GI tumors. There is growing evidence by data from mostly Asian trials implying the impact of SNPs related to susceptibility and prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and cancer of the gastroesophageal junction.

Additional to the well-described SNPs of genes playing a role in the metabolism of fluorouracil and platin derivates, i.e., thymidylate synthase (TS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), excision repair cross-complementing group 1 and 2 (ERCC1, 2), X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), the range must be extended to implement taxans and monoclonal antibodies (7).

With the growing importance of FLOT both in the perioperative and palliative setting, taxan-induced neuropathy and neutropenia may be the cause of severe side-effects. Comparability and reproducibility of SNPs involved in docetaxel metabolism is hampered by sparse data, lacking validation, heterogeneous trials, various treatment lines, different regimens and tumor entities. Taking into account the preliminary data of the PRODIGY trial, the importance of docetaxel could increase in Asian countries in the neoadjuvant setting (8). Particularly in the view of different tumor biology and ethnic differences in chemotherapeutic metabolism, a comprehensive collection of respective SNP data is warranted.

A novel approach to select patients suffering from Her2 positive metastatic gastric cancer for treatment with trastuzumab is followed by Pietrantonio et al. (9). Using a panel of candidate genomic alterations and amplifications including EGFR/MET/KRAS/PI3K/PTEN, they could demonstrate that patients without candidate alterations had a significantly longer median PFS and OS. Furthermore, the authors stress the relevance of other potential oncogenic drivers whose co-amplification may lead to a resistance to trastuzumab. In this regard, for future trials a more comprehensive approach and detailed molecular profiling for translational research in treatment studies is demanded. Apart from that, basket trials should help to provide respective numbers of patients to identify mutations putative of treatment response or toxicity regardless of the tumor entity and stage. In Korean patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving second line therapy, high expression of placental growth factor in tumor tissue was found to be a negative predictive biomarker for the treatment with ramucirumab (10). With new therapeutic options beyond classical chemotherapy in second and further line therapy, there will be an increasing demand for tools of treatment individualization as well.

To pick up the title of the comment by Perkhofer and Hann, SNPs are not the new predictors of therapy decisions but should be further advanced as existing and developing and be integral part of patient tailored therapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.06). SS reports personal fees from AMGEN, personal fees from BAYER, personal fees from Esai-Lilly, personal fees from Merck KGaA, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Pierre Fabre, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Samsung Medical, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Servier, personal fees from Taiho, personal fees from Takeda, outside the submitted work. C Schulz has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Perkhofer L, Hann A. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as the new predictors of therapy decisions in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma? Transl Cancer Res 2019;8:1656-8. [Crossref]
  2. Schulz C, Zhang W, Lenz HJ, et al. Germline polymorphisms (SNPs) to predict toxicity and efficacy in FLOT-treated patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma—data from the NeoFLOT study. Transl Cancer Res 2018;7:1393-405. [Crossref]
  3. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016;27:v38-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft DK, AWMF):. S3-Leitlinie Magenkarzinom, Langversion 2.01 (Konsultationsfassung), 2019 AWMF Registernummer: 032/009OL. Available online: http://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologiede/leitlinien/magenkarzinom
  5. Lorenzen S, Blank S, Lordick F, et al. Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2119-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Lorenzen S, Thuss-Patience P, Al-Batran SE, et al. Impact of pathologic complete response on disease-free survival in patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma receiving preoperative docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2068-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Goekkurt E, Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, et al. Pharmacogenetic analyses of a phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil and leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the arbeitsgemeinschaft internistische onkologie. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2863-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Kang YK, Yook JH, Park YK, et al. Phase III randomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with docetaxel(D), oxaliplatin(O) and S-1(S) (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1, vs surgery and adjuvant S-1, for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC) (PRODIGY). Ann Oncol 2019;30:v876-7. [Crossref]
  9. Pietrantonio F, Fucà G, Morano F, et al. Biomarkers of Primary Resistance to Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients: the AMNESIA Case-Control Study. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:1082-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Natsume M, Shimura T, Iwasaki H, et al. Placental growth factor is a predictive biomarker for ramucirumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019;83:1037-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Schulz C, Stintzing S. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as the new predictors of therapy decisions in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma? Transl Cancer Res 2020;9(4):2175-2177. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.06