Long non-coding RNAs: new opportunities and old challenges in cancer therapy
Commentary

Long non-coding RNAs: new opportunities and old challenges in cancer therapy

Gwyn T. Williams1, Mark R. Pickard2

1Apoptosis Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK; 2Chester Centre for Stress Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Chester, Chester, UK

Correspondence to: Gwyn T. Williams. Apoptosis Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Huxley Building, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK. Email: g.t.williams@keele.ac.uk; Mark R. Pickard. Institute of Medicine, Bache Hall, University of Chester, Chester CH2 1BR, UK. Email: m.pickard@chester.ac.uk.

Comment on: Pickard MR, Williams GT. The hormone response element mimic sequence of GAS5 lncRNA is sufficient to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016;7:10104-16.


Submitted Aug 01, 2016. Accepted for publication Aug 09, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/tcr.2016.09.04


The investigation of long non-protein-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has become a key area in biological and biomedical research. This is the result of sequencing and analysis of the human genome, which showed that only around 2% encodes proteins, together with the analysis of RNA transcripts (the transcriptome), which showed that a further 80% or so of the genome is actively transcribed (1,2). Consequently, it is now clear that most of the human genome largely encodes non-protein-coding RNAs, most of which, at greater than 200 nucleotides, are classified as lncRNAs. Although we are only just beginning to analyse this vast number of transcripts, it is already evident that many lncRNAs play crucial roles in human molecular cell biology ranging from providing essential frameworks for RNA processing, through the epigenetic control of gene expression, to blocking and regulating cell signalling pathways [reviewed by Morris and Mattick (3)]. It is not surprising therefore that dysfunction in many lncRNAs has already been strongly implicated in oncogenesis and in the development of resistance to cancer therapy (4). Such a profound advance in our understanding of human cell physiology and pathology will clearly present many opportunities for the development of entirely novel cancer therapies.

There are already multiple studies that indicate that many lncRNAs can act as tumour suppressors, and many others as oncogenes (4). As for protein tumour suppressors and oncogenes, this provides new opportunities for specific cancer therapies through restoring and enhancing lncRNA tumour suppressor activity where that has been lost, and through inhibiting lncRNA oncogenic activity where that contributes to oncogenesis and/ or resistance to therapy. The GAS5 lncRNA, for example, has been shown to regulate proliferation and survival in lymphoid cells (5), shows tumour suppressor activity in a wide range of cancers (6-9) and can restore sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents (6). Although the tumour suppressor activity of GAS5 appears to be mediated by several different interactions (6), as for many other lncRNAs, this activity in breast and prostate cancer cells is predominantly due to interaction of a stem-loop RNA sequence within GAS5 exon 12 with glucocorticoid/related hormone receptors (10). This part of the GAS5 lncRNA acts as a hormone response element mimic (HREM) and blocks the endocrine survival signal(s) otherwise mediated through these pathways. Thus this part of the GAS5 lncRNA acts as a decoy and prevents the hormone/hormone receptor complex from binding to its usual target genes (10,11). If this tumour suppressor activity can be restored with a short nucleotide sequence mimicking the GAS5 HREM sequence, this would be a much more realistic approach than re-introducing the whole of GAS5 by gene therapy, and recent work has demonstrated proof of principle of this oligonucleotide approach (12). The introduction of a 23-base oligomer with the HREM sequence into a range of breast cancer cell lines (including triple-negative cell lines) induced apoptosis and reduced clonogenicity in a manner that closely replicated the effects of GAS5 lncRNA itself, including the sensitivity of these effects to a specific loss-of-function mutation (12). These results clearly encourage analysis of the effects of oligonucleotides designed to mimic critical sections of other tumour-suppressive lncRNAs.

Encouraging initial observations have also been made in logically complementary strategies intended to inhibit oncogenic lncRNAs. Downregulation of lncRNAs, including those localised in the nucleus, can be efficiently accomplished using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) (13). metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), for example, is a relatively abundant lncRNA that is upregulated in several cancers [reviewed by Ren et al. (14)]. Downregulation of MALAT1 has been achieved in vivo in a mouse model of breast cancer using ASOs, resulting in altered gene expression and RNA splicing together with a substantial reduction in metastasis (15).

These studies and many others underline the potential of oligonucleotide-based therapy to produce highly specific modulation of the expression of lncRNAs with clear applications in cancer therapy, and, naturally, this prospect has driven improvements in the technology required to realise this potential in real clinical applications. Although other oligonucleotide-based therapies have already produced significant successes in pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and some fully approved clinical applications [e.g., (16)], substantial challenges remain. Most of these challenges are familiar from other types of cancer therapy: How can maximal penetration of cancer cells be achieved? How can tumours be specifically targeted with minimal effects on healthy tissues? How can stability be improved for oligonucleotides exposed to host degradative enzymes? Given the considerable incentive of molecule-specific lncRNA cancer therapy, it is likely that these problems will be overcome. Significant improvements in oligonucleotide stability and cell penetration have been made through changes in nucleotide chemistry (17), and by attachment to peptides activated by the acidic tumour environment (18), for example. Advances in nanoparticle technology and immune-targeting of tumour antigens have, in turn, improved the specificity of oligonucleotide delivery (19).

Although oligonucleotide therapy offers exquisite specificity in targeting lncRNAs, the development of lncRNA-targeting small molecules is also realistic. Fatemi and colleagues (20) screened a library of phytochemical compounds for molecules interfering with the interaction of lncRNA BDNF-AS (BDNF-antisense RNA) with EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2—a key enzyme controlling epigenetic modification of chromatin) and successfully identified ellipticine, which up-regulated BDNF transcription. Similar antisense lncRNAs are frequently involved in the epigenetic control of gene expression, and targeting of this class of lncRNAs offers particular promise for the development of highly specific cancer therapies.

Although the lncRNA field is still in its early stages—after all, over 50% of the genome has yet to be analysed in detail for its function—it is clear that this area presents almost unprecedented opportunities for novel cancer therapies. The appreciation of this potential is rapidly growing and should result in much-needed improvements for patients before long.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by Breast Cancer Now, Prostate Cancer UK and Bloodwise.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by the Section Editor Long Chen (Department of PET-CT center at the Yunnan Tumor Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2016.09.04). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57-74. [PubMed]
  2. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature 2012;489:101-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Morris KV, Mattick JS. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15:423-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Huarte M. The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nat Med 2015;21:1253-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Mourtada-Maarabouni M, Hedge VL, Kirkham L, et al. Growth arrest in human T-cells is controlled by the non-coding RNA growth-arrest-specific transcript 5 (GAS5). J Cell Sci 2008;121:939-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Pickard MR, Williams GT. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Action of Tumour Suppressor GAS5 LncRNA. Genes (Basel) 2015;6:484-99. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Mourtada-Maarabouni M, Pickard MR, Hedge VL, et al. GAS5, a non-protein-coding RNA, controls apoptosis and is downregulated in breast cancer. Oncogene 2009;28:195-208. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Chen L, Yang H, Xiao Y, et al. LncRNA GAS5 is a critical regulator of metastasis phenotype of melanoma cells and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:4075-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Pickard MR, Mourtada-Maarabouni M, Williams GT. Long non-coding RNA GAS5 regulates apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1832:1613-23.
  10. Hudson WH, Pickard MR, de Vera IM, et al. Conserved sequence-specific lincRNA-steroid receptor interactions drive transcriptional repression and direct cell fate. Nat Commun 2014;5:5395. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Kino T, Hurt DE, Ichijo T, et al. Noncoding RNA gas5 is a growth arrest- and starvation-associated repressor of the glucocorticoid receptor. Sci Signal 2010;3:ra8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Pickard MR, Williams GT. The hormone response element mimic sequence of GAS5 lncRNA is sufficient to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016;7:10104-16. [PubMed]
  13. Zhou T, Kim Y, MacLeod AR, et al. Targeting Long Noncoding RNA with Antisense Oligonucleotide Technology as Cancer Therapeutics. Methods Mol Biol 2016;1402:199-213. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Ren D, Li H, Li R, et al. Novel insight into MALAT-1 in cancer: Therapeutic targets and clinical applications. Oncol Lett 2016;11:1621-30. [PubMed]
  15. Arun G, Diermeier S, Akerman M, et al. Differentiation of mammary tumors and reduction in metastasis upon Malat1 lncRNA loss. Genes Dev 2016;30:34-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Hair P, Cameron F, McKeage K. Mipomersen sodium: first global approval. Drugs 2013;73:487-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Juliano R, Alam MR, Dixit V, et al. Mechanisms and strategies for effective delivery of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:4158-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Cheng CJ, Bahal R, Babar IA, et al. MicroRNA silencing for cancer therapy targeted to the tumour microenvironment. Nature 2015;518:107-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Gobbo OL, Sjaastad K, Radomski MW, et al. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics. Theranostics 2015;5:1249-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Pedram Fatemi R, Salah-Uddin S, Modarresi F, et al. Screening for Small-Molecule Modulators of Long Noncoding RNA-Protein Interactions Using AlphaScreen. J Biomol Screen 2015;20:1132-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Williams GT, Pickard MR. Long non-coding RNAs: new opportunities and old challenges in cancer therapy. Transl Cancer Res 2016;5(Suppl 3):S564-S566. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2016.09.04

Download Citation