CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in glioma stem cells—prospects for therapeutic intervention
Editorial

CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in glioma stem cells—prospects for therapeutic intervention

Tsubasa Miyazaki1,3, Yoji Uemae3, Eiichi Ishikawa2

1Department of Neurosurgery, Graduated School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; 2Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan; 3Cell-Medicine, Inc. (a venture company for research and development of immunotherapy from University of Tsukuba in Japan), Sengen 2-1-6, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan

Correspondence to: Eiichi Ishikawa. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan. Email: e-ishikawa@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Ning Huang (Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China).

Comment on: Calinescu AA, Yadav VN, Carballo E, et al. Survival and Proliferation of Neural Progenitor-Derived Glioblastomas Under Hypoxic Stress is Controlled by a CXCL12/CXCR4 Autocrine-Positive Feedback Mechanism. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:1250-62.


Submitted Feb 10, 2017. Accepted for publication Mar 10, 2017.

doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.03.63


Glioblastomas (GBM) are highly invasive and angiogenic brain tumors that progress rapidly. The disease is intractable despite aggressive treatment, including postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Glioma stem cells (GSCs), which are phenotypically similar to neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells (NPCs), are more resistant to cancer therapies than differentiated GBM cells. One of the characteristics of GSCs is the utilization of the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway in the tumor microenvironment.

CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling involves the chemokine, CXCL12, and its receptor, CXCR4, and is linked to the proliferation, survival, migration and homing of tumor cells. Many malignant tumors, such as breast, lung, kidney, prostate, melanoma, colon, pancreatic cancers and glioma, express the chemokine receptor, CXCR4 (1,2). For glioma, recent findings showed that CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression increases with tumor grade (3) and GSCs express CXCR4. CXCL12, also known as stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α), attracts stem cells, immune cells and tumor cells via CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling (4). The brain subventricular zones (SVZs) are major sources of NPCs and attract GSCs through CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling (5). CXCL12 is also secreted from blood vessels and tumor cells at inflammatory or hypoxic tumor sites, and tumor cells, endothelial progenitor cells, macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) accumulate in these areas (6,7). CXCL12 influences the tumor microenvironment to promote tumor cell growth, escape from immune surveillance and maintenance of stem cell function.

Researchers have utilized CD133+ GSCs derived from GBM tissue (8) or classical sphere forming GBM cell lines in serum-free medium (9) as GSC models. However, transgenic GSC models derived from NPCs have also been established. Genetically engineered NPCs can form GSCs with pathogenic features similar to human GBM, in vivo (10). Calinescu et al. established a GSC model using the sleeping beauty transposase system by injecting recombinant oncogenic DNA vectors carrying NRAS and SV40-LgT into the lateral ventricles of mice (11). NPCs pooled in the SVZ while in contact with the lateral ventricles. Tumors arose that were histopathologically similar to human GBM, including multinucleated giant cell formation, atypical mitoses, vascular proliferation, pseudo-palisading necrosis, perivascular and diffuse invasion, and hemorrhages. The tumor cells isolated from the mouse model were intracranially transplanted into another mouse, and expression of stem cell markers, GBM formation and lethality within 30 days were confirmed. CD133 expression was maintained on the surface of sphere cells formed by culturing resected tumor cells in serum-free medium. These data indicated that this transgenic GSC model retains strong stemness characteristics, both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, Calinescu et al. also showed that CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling regulates the proliferation of CXCL12 expressing GSCs derived from NPCs (11).


Direct effects of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling on GSCs in vitro

Previous studies suggested that CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling promotes GBM cell proliferation (4). Calinescu et al. demonstrated that AMD3100, an antagonist of CXCR4, inhibits the proliferation of GSC cell lines, especially after exposure for 4 days or longer. The addition of CXCL12 significantly reduced these inhibitory effects. This indicates that CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling drives the proliferation of GSCs.

HIF-1α controls the transcription of many genes that play pivotal roles in angiogenesis, cell survival, genomic stability, invasion and metastasis (12). HIF-1α expression under hypoxic conditions promotes the expansion of GSCs and inhibits the induction of GSC differentiation (13). A previous paper reported that radiation and hypoxia induced the HIF-1α dependent release of CXCL12. Induction of HIF-1α expression by hypoxia or radiation requires TGF-β (14). According to Calinescu et al., GSCs simultaneously increased the expression of cell-cycle regulators (CyclinD1, Cdk4, Cdk6) and CXCL12 regulatory molecules (Cxcl12, Hif1-α, Tgf-β) by day 4 in culture. AMD3100 suppressed the overexpression of all of these molecules except HIF-1α, and reduced the proliferation of GSCs. In our opinion, since GSCs form spheres in serum-free medium, GSCs sphere formation may worsen the nutrition and oxygen supply into inside of sphere, and may make hypoxia environment, thereby promoting the expression of HIF-1α. However, if AMD3100 also regulates the expression of these activated genes in vivo, the drug may be therapeutically effective against GSCs.

Previous studies mainly focused on CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression within the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling cascade. Calinescu et al. expanded the analysis to relevant CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling target genes, including Retinoblastoma (Rb) and HIF-1α. After several days of culture, activation of the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling loop increased in GSCs. AMD3100 reduced HIF-1α protein levels, but did not affect HIF-1α mRNA expression. These results suggest that CXCR4 signaling may control HIF-1α turnover via the ubiquitin proteasome pathway under hypoxia. Further research is required to verify this possibility, and determine whether HIF-1α protein levels are regulated in a similar way in other GBM cells. As CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling controls a wide range of cellular functions, DNA microarray and proteomic profiling will help to develop a more comprehensive picture of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in the future.


Indirect effects of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling on GSCs in vivo

In the Calinescu model, GSCs derived from NPCs in the mouse brain produce CXCL12 and express nestin (a stem cell marker) as late as day 35 of tumorigenesis suggesting that stem cell characteristics are stably maintained. At the same time in this tumor model, there was a large amount of CD11b+ myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) and macrophage infiltration into the tumor microenvironment (11). This phenomenon is consistent with our GSC study (15). MDSCs and macrophages attenuate immune cell function and provide a favorable environment for tumor growth, survival and migration (16). In addition, genomic profiling data suggest that macrophage-like gene expression signatures in GBM tissue are a poor prognostic feature (17), which may be an important consideration in the clinical setting. Indeed, the prognosis for mouse GBM was improved by preventing infiltration of monocytes using anti-CXCR4 antibody (18). CXCR4 blockade mediated inhibition of infiltrating monocytes may be more important than the cytostatic effect on GSCs for improving the prognosis of GBM patients.

The Calinescu study suggested that GSCs respond to autocrine and/or paracrine CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling. GSCs invade the brain parenchyma and are maintained within vascular niches (19). CXCL12 expressing GSCs facilitate CXCR4+ cell aggregation and the activation and maintenance of autocrine/paracrine CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling loops. Even for small or satellite GSC colonies, CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling promotes recurrence after aggressive treatment, similar to human GBM.

During tumor growth, rapid GSC proliferation generates hypoxic conditions and promotes angiogenesis. Even though the hypoxic environment is disadvantageous for tumor growth, VEGF secreted by GBM cells induces CXCL12 expression by tumor vessels. Release of CXCL12 is also regulated by TGF-β-dependent HIF-1α and TGF-β is secreted by tumor associated macrophages. Ultimately, large amounts of CXCL12 in the proliferative tumor microenvironment strongly promote the preferential survival and proliferation of GSCs over differentiated GBM cells.

Angiogenesis is prominent in the GBM microenvironment, and angiogenic factors are therapeutic targets. VEGF/VEGFR signaling is the most important regulator of angiogenesis. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, inhibits tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth in GBM patients and GBM mouse models. Bevacizumab resistant GBM tissues express high levels of CXCR4, which is correlated with rapid tumor growth. This suggests that CXCR4 expressing GSCs are resistant to anti-angiogenic therapy. Combination therapy with bevacizumab and CXCR4 antagonists induces tumor cell apoptosis and prolongs the disease-free survival and overall survival of tumor engrafted mice (20). A Phase I study of AMD3100 and bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma that is currently underway (NCT01339039) will evaluate the significance of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling and angiogenesis in GBM.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Koshiba T, Hosotani R, Miyamoto Y, et al. Expression of stromal cell-derived factor 1 and CXCR4 ligand receptor system in pancreatic cancer: a possible role for tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:3530-5. [PubMed]
  2. Müller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2001;410:50-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Rempel SA, Dudas S, Ge S, et al. Identification and localization of the cytokine SDF1 and its receptor, CXC chemokine receptor 4, to regions of necrosis and angiogenesis in human glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:102-11. [PubMed]
  4. Jiang Z, Zhou W, Guan S, et al. Contribution of SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling to brain development and glioma progression. Neurosignals 2013;21:240-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Goffart N, Kroonen J, Di Valentin E, et al. Adult mouse subventricular zones stimulate glioblastoma stem cells specific invasion through CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:81-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Chanmee T, Ontong P, Konno K, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages as major players in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6:1670-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Sciaccaluga M, Fioretti B, Catacuzzeno L, et al. CXCL12-induced glioblastoma cell migration requires intermediate conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010;299:C175-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Ping YF, Yao XH, Jiang JY, et al. The chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 promote glioma stem cell-mediated VEGF production and tumour angiogenesis via PI3K/AKT signalling. J Pathol 2011;224:344-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Ledur PF, Villodre ES, Paulus R, et al. Extracellular ATP reduces tumor sphere growth and cancer stem cell population in glioblastoma cells. Purinergic Signal 2012;8:39-48. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Holland EC, Celestino J, Dai C, et al. Combined activation of Ras and Akt in neural progenitors induces glioblastoma formation in mice. Nat Genet 2000;25:55-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Calinescu AA, Yadav VN, Carballo E, et al. Survival and Proliferation of Neural Progenitor-Derived Glioblastomas Under Hypoxic Stress is Controlled by a CXCL12/CXCR4 Autocrine-Positive Feedback Mechanism. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:1250-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Bar EE. Glioblastoma, cancer stem cells and hypoxia. Brain Pathol 2011;21:119-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Soeda A, Park M, Lee D, et al. Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1alpha. Oncogene 2009;28:3949-59. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Tabatabai G, Frank B, Mohle R, et al. Irradiation and hypoxia promote homing of haematopoietic progenitor cells towards gliomas by TGF-beta-dependent HIF-1alpha-mediated induction of CXCL12. Brain 2006;129:2426-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Uemae Y, Ishikawa E, Osuka S, et al. CXCL12 secreted from glioma stem cells regulates their proliferation. J Neurooncol 2014;117:43-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Ugel S, De Sanctis F, Mandruzzato S, et al. Tumor-induced myeloid deviation: when myeloid-derived suppressor cells meet tumor-associated macrophages. J Clin Invest 2015;125:3365-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Iglesia MD, Parker JS, Hoadley KA, et al. Genomic Analysis of Immune Cell Infiltrates Across 11 Tumor Types. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016;108:djw144. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, et al. Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J Clin Invest 2010;120:694-705. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 2007;11:69-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Gravina GL, Mancini A, Marampon F, et al. The brain-penetrating CXCR4 antagonist, PRX177561, increases the antitumor effects of bevacizumab and sunitinib in preclinical models of human glioblastoma. J Hematol Oncol 2017;10:5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Miyazaki T, Uemae Y, Ishikawa E. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in glioma stem cells—prospects for therapeutic intervention. Transl Cancer Res 2017;6(Suppl 2):S434-S437. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.03.63